Perceived Learning Satisfaction on Diverse Instructional Modalities Encountered by Cebu Doctors' University Level III and Level IV Medical Students of A.Y. 2023–2024
Keywords:
Medical education, instructional modalities, medical students learning satisfaction, medical education teaching assessment, clinical skills and learning experiencesAbstract
This study investigates perceived learning satisfaction among medical students across three instructional modalities—face-to-face, online, and blended learning—at Cebu Doctors’ University (CDU) during Academic Year 2023–2024. The hypothesis posits significant differences in satisfaction levels, with face-to-face learning expected to yield the highest satisfaction. Participants included 145 verified and enrolled Level III and Level IV medical students, including irregular students, who had experienced all three modalities: face-to-face (A.Y. 2023–2024), online (A.Y. 2021–2022), and blended learning (A.Y. 2022–2023). A descriptive-comparative research design was employed to compare perceived learning satisfaction across the three instructional approaches. Data were collected using a modified version of the Student Outcomes Survey from the National Center for Vocational Education Research in Australia, covering three domains: Teaching, Assessment, and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences. The instrument demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). Results showed that face-to-face learning had the highest overall satisfaction (M = 4.3, SD = 0.5), followed by blended learning (M = 4.3, SD = 0.5), and lastly, online learning (M = 3.8, SD = 0.7). A One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference in satisfaction across modalities, F(1.328, 191.192) = 75.267, p < .05, η2 = 34.3%. The Teaching domain received the highest ratings across all modalities, while Assessment domain and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences domain received the lowest ratings in online learning. The findings suggest that face-to-face learning provides the highest level of student satisfaction, followed by blended and online learning. This hierarchy underscores the value of direct interaction in enhancing student satisfaction. The study recommends that educational institutions prioritize face-to-face and blended learning to optimize student outcomes, while future research should explore strategies to improve online learning satisfaction, particularly in the areas of Assessment and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences.
References
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Essa, E. K. (2023). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in enhancing academic mindfulness and deeper learning of university students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3081
Fattah, M. E. A. (2016). Academic satisfaction and its relationship to internal locus of control among students of Najran University. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(4), 1-5. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/download/28946/29709
Fieger, P. (2012). Measuring student satisfaction from the Student Outcomes Survey. National Centre for Vocational Education Research. https://www.ncver.edu.au/data/assets/file/0018/3582/2492.pdf
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Kurt, Dr. S. (2021, February 21). Constructivist learning theory. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning- theory/
Li, X., Odhiambo, F. A., & Ocansey, D. K. W. (2023). The effect of students’ online learning experience on their satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1095073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095073
Pidgeon, A. M., Davies, N. L., & Stapleton, P. (2017). Factors influencing university students’ academic experience: An international study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 2(1), 1-8. https://www.academia.edu/116276806/Factors_Influencing_University_Students_Academic_Experience_An_International_Study
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Tarazi, A., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2023). Students’ perceptions towards the role of online teaching platforms in enhancing online engagement and academic performance levels in Palestinian Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 13(5), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050449
Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anika Margarita A. Ramiro, Ashley Camille C. Apil, Chudney C. Castro, Eloisa May V. Dano, Julianne Marie M. Jaojoco, Kristine Adrelle S. Modina, Elloisa Felline Y. Siangco, Jaylyn Florence T. Uy, December Rose B. Yazar, Eunice E. Melana-Tiu, MD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Readers can freely access and download the PDF, but for non-commercial purposes only and should not be used for monetary purposes.

