Perceived Learning Satisfaction on Diverse Instructional Modalities Encountered by Cebu Doctors' University Level III and Level IV Medical Students of A.Y. 2023–2024

Authors

  • Anika Margarita A. Ramiro Cebu Doctors' University
  • Ashley Camille C. Apil Cebu Doctors' University
  • Chudney C. Castro Cebu Doctors' University
  • Eloisa May V. Dano Cebu Doctors' University
  • Julianne Marie M. Jaojoco Cebu Doctors' University
  • Kristine Adrelle S. Modina Cebu Doctors' University
  • Elloisa Felline Y. Siangco Cebu Doctors' University
  • Jaylyn Florence T. Uy Cebu Doctors' University
  • December Rose B. Yazar Cebu Doctors' University
  • Eunice E. Melana-Tiu, MD College of Medicine, Cebu Doctors' University

Keywords:

Medical education, instructional modalities, medical students learning satisfaction, medical education teaching assessment, clinical skills and learning experiences

Abstract

This study investigates perceived learning satisfaction among medical students across three instructional modalities—face-to-face, online, and blended learning—at Cebu Doctors’ University (CDU) during Academic Year 2023–2024. The hypothesis posits significant differences in satisfaction levels, with face-to-face learning expected to yield the highest satisfaction. Participants included 145 verified and enrolled Level III and Level IV medical students, including irregular students, who had experienced all three modalities: face-to-face (A.Y. 2023–2024), online (A.Y. 2021–2022), and blended learning (A.Y. 2022–2023). A descriptive-comparative research design was employed to compare perceived learning satisfaction across the three instructional approaches. Data were collected using a modified version of the Student Outcomes Survey from the National Center for Vocational Education Research in Australia, covering three domains: Teaching, Assessment, and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences. The instrument demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). Results showed that face-to-face learning had the highest overall satisfaction (M = 4.3, SD = 0.5), followed by blended learning (M = 4.3, SD = 0.5), and lastly, online learning (M = 3.8, SD = 0.7). A One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference in satisfaction across modalities, F(1.328, 191.192) = 75.267, p < .05, η2 = 34.3%. The Teaching domain received the highest ratings across all modalities, while Assessment domain and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences domain received the lowest ratings in online learning. The findings suggest that face-to-face learning provides the highest level of student satisfaction, followed by blended and online learning. This hierarchy underscores the value of direct interaction in enhancing student satisfaction. The study recommends that educational institutions prioritize face-to-face and blended learning to optimize student outcomes, while future research should explore strategies to improve online learning satisfaction, particularly in the areas of Assessment and Clinical Skills & Learning Experiences.

References

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116

Essa, E. K. (2023). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in enhancing academic mindfulness and deeper learning of university students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3081

Fattah, M. E. A. (2016). Academic satisfaction and its relationship to internal locus of control among students of Najran University. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(4), 1-5. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/download/28946/29709

Fieger, P. (2012). Measuring student satisfaction from the Student Outcomes Survey. National Centre for Vocational Education Research. https://www.ncver.edu.au/data/assets/file/0018/3582/2492.pdf

Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278

Kurt, Dr. S. (2021, February 21). Constructivist learning theory. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning- theory/

Li, X., Odhiambo, F. A., & Ocansey, D. K. W. (2023). The effect of students’ online learning experience on their satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1095073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095073

Pidgeon, A. M., Davies, N. L., & Stapleton, P. (2017). Factors influencing university students’ academic experience: An international study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 2(1), 1-8. https://www.academia.edu/116276806/Factors_Influencing_University_Students_Academic_Experience_An_International_Study

Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

Tarazi, A., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2023). Students’ perceptions towards the role of online teaching platforms in enhancing online engagement and academic performance levels in Palestinian Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 13(5), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050449

Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Ramiro, A. M., Apil, A. C., Castro, C., Dano, E. M., Jaojoco, J. M., Modina, K. A., … Melana-Tiu, E. (2024). Perceived Learning Satisfaction on Diverse Instructional Modalities Encountered by Cebu Doctors’ University Level III and Level IV Medical Students of A.Y. 2023–2024. Journal of Scientific Investigations, 3(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://jsi.cdu.edu.ph/index.php/jsi/article/view/66

Issue

Section

Full Articles